Autot ja ajoneuvot

When F1 Cars Used ROCKET FUEL!

This car produces over 1400 horsepower, largely because it’s running on Rocket Fuel.
Back in the 80s, there were no restrictions on the type of fuel car’s used, so being F1 - the teams took it to the extremes.
They used a formula that created massive power and allowed the turbos to be turned up higher than ever before - but just one catch - it was extremely toxic and is a known carcinogen! Not to mention it’s tendency to cause engines to blow up!
➤ Subscribe for more incredible motorsport: goo.gl/AbD2f9
➤Follow us on:
➤ Instagram- @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61Insta
➤TikTok - @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61TikTok
We all love the genius innovations that came out of F1 in the 80s - ground effect, massive turbos and carbon monocoque chassis’.
The introduction of 1.5 litre turbo engines brought a load of changes in F1, with the most obvious being the huge increase in power. Some of the cars on the grid had as much as 1500 horsepower - they were absolute rocket-ships!.
A big side-effect of the turbos was a massive increase in fuel consumption. The huge turbos pressurise air going into the cylinders, which along with more air - needed more fuel.
At points, the cars were using more than 300 litres of fuel per race! That’s nearly three times what today’s cars are allowed to use.
The teams needed to find a way to use less fuel - they came up with some ingenious, but dangerous solutions - more on that later.
In 1984, after a spite of pit-stop fires, the FIA banned the refueling of cars during races. With this they placed a cap on the size of fuel tank at 220 litres, meaning the drivers had to save a lot of fuel during the race.
For drivers, this meant needing to either lift-off the throttle way before braking, shifting-up earlier or turning down the turbo’s boost pressure. Lifting off the throttle and costing before braking is the most efficient way to save fuel without losing too much lap-time, as the engine is using most fuel when flat out at the end of a straight.
The San Marino Grand Prix in 1985 summed it up perfectly. Senna took pole and led up to lap 57, where he suddenly ground to a halt - he ran out of fuel. Johansson then took the lead in his first race for Ferrari, and then - you guessed it - ran out of fuel.
The same happened to Brundle, Warwick, Piquet and Boutsen. Boutsen, luckily stopped on the pit-straight and actually pushed his car over the line. But not before de Angelis could pass him.
Prost actually crossed the finish line in the lead, but was disqualified as he ran out of fuel on the cool-down lap - leaving no fuel left for the compulsory FIA test sample - handing de Angelis his first win!
A truly crazy race that showed how difficult it was to save fuel with those huge turbo engines. Of the 26 cars that started the race, only 5 finished!
📺 F1 Driver’s Technique Explained
➤ Senna’s bizarre technique: bit.ly/3lORK59
➤ How Schumacher’s style won 7 championships: bit.ly/3527cVz
➤ Alonso’s strange steering: bit.ly/2Z7a93v
➤ How Verstappen will be F1 champion: bit.ly/3jK6L6n
➤ How Verstappen is so fast in the wet: bit.ly/32WMVhr
📺 F1 Engineering
➤ How F1 brakes work: bit.ly/3h0Whh0
➤ How an F1 clutch works: bit.ly/3i0oDJM
➤ What’s inside an F1 gearbox: bit.ly/2DzMqRW
➤ How F1 teams change four tyres in two seconds: bit.ly/2QVpkIl
🏎️ Track & Racing Driver!
➤ Get a free report on your track driving: bit.ly/2LmYNBA
➤ Get faster on track with our FREE 25-part tutorial series:bit.ly/2PypIMK
➤ Our real-world training programmes: bit.ly/2ktjtgV
🏁 Sim Racers!
➤ My sim wheel: bit.ly/354BBlY
➤ My sim pedals: bit.ly/3eJckQo
➤ Our sim racing course: bit.ly/34WuV7p
➤ Get a free report on your track driving: bit.ly/2LmYNBA
➤ Driver61 Sim Racing Channel: bit.ly/2BMdk4B
00:00 When F1 Cars Used Rocket Fuel
00:32 Our Favourite Loop-Hole Finders
00:55 1.2 MPG!
01:25 Fuel Freezing
04:09 Rocket Fuel
05:37 What's Octane?
06:59 Highest Fuel Bill Ever
07:15 Toluene's Biggest Problem
07:33 The End of the Turbo Era
08:45 What Fuel Do Today's F1 Cars Use?
#RocketFuel #Formula1 #Engineering

Kommentteja 

  1. Driver61

    Driver61

    2 kuukautta sitten

    Who else loves watching these iconic races from the 80s? They bravery of these guys. *Shameless Plug* - You should follow us on TikTok @official_driver61

    • Michael Foye

      Michael Foye

      2 kuukautta sitten

      @Donald Moser Rubber in your teeth is the only way to fully appreciate the race.

    • Michael Foye

      Michael Foye

      2 kuukautta sitten

      All that intrepid bravery, destroyed by the regulatory noose of the milquetoast greys.

    • simon trucker

      simon trucker

      2 kuukautta sitten

      The 1980s was one of the most amazing decades in F1, and as I was born in 1966 and the right age to take it in, I would consider it my favourite. Just an aside if you're interested in fuels and engineering etc, check out the series on YT on the legendary 1960s Top Fuel Dragster team, 'The Surfers'. They ran their car on a 95% Nitro 5% Toluene mix. It's a fascinating series of interviews. And as for the carcinogenic nature of this stuff? I spent 21yrs driving petrol tankers and am now fighting brain cancer. Just saying. Keep the videos coming.

    • Alan Angcao

      Alan Angcao

      2 kuukautta sitten

      Senna was the master of pushing turbo cars to the limit as if you ever used these cars in sims (without traction and stability control you cheeky blokes) they are unstable as hell just pressing 50% of the throttle, the car’s backend could snap which can be hard to control.

    • Dani Gonzalez

      Dani Gonzalez

      2 kuukautta sitten

      Not me if you dont state facts correct, mate. You do too many mistakes. In the Williams video it was way worse even. Please, check history before posting.

  2. Hot-Dog dealer

    Hot-Dog dealer

    Päivä sitten

    So f1 engineneers are basically rocket sientists

  3. Jeremy Johnson

    Jeremy Johnson

    3 päivää sitten

    Toluene, not tolulene! ;)

  4. Jude Ackland-Patel

    Jude Ackland-Patel

    3 päivää sitten

    Love the video. Small thing to note: toluene along with hypogolic carcinogenic chemicals stopped being used as main rocket fuels decades ago, even before the apollo program. They are still used very rarely as a reaction control monopropellent in satellites and such, but otherwise toluene isn't really "rocket fuel". In fact, the vastly most common rocket fuel, RP-1 (+LOX), is much more similar to diesel , being a form of kerosene. The only other widely accepted rocket fuels are liquid hydrogen, methane and hydrazene.

  5. Andrea23IT

    Andrea23IT

    4 päivää sitten

    0:11 When you are an italian and pay for the RAI and then you see a non italian put it in a video for (i think) free...

  6. Mr. Monaco

    Mr. Monaco

    4 päivää sitten

    Great video, thank you!

  7. Philipp Duffner

    Philipp Duffner

    5 päivää sitten

    Maybe a bit misleading. The rockets you show, including the Falcon 9, are modern rockets. They do not run on Toluene. They do not use the highly toxic fuel you talk about. Actually I dont know a single rocket of recent centuries that used Toluene in major volumes... Maybe someone remembers a rocket?

  8. Cold

    Cold

    6 päivää sitten

    Group B Lancia and F1 BMW are like the kids in the playground that take the game to an extreme and ruin it for everyone when mommy sees

  9. jooched

    jooched

    8 päivää sitten

    Race fuel has always been controversial, but it's not rocket fuel. An interesting fact is that they had to heat the toluene fuel to about 70 degrees C before injecting it into the engine to get good vaporization. I really miss those days even if they were very irresponsible and dirty. Toluene is extremely harmful to the brain and nervous system, being a solvent it will literately dissolve the brain (lookup painters disease). How much one's health is affected by toluene also depends on your DNA.

  10. Jake Free Music

    Jake Free Music

    9 päivää sitten

    1:25 *Poor guy*

  11. Kevin J. Dildonik

    Kevin J. Dildonik

    9 päivää sitten

    "Race cars want high octane fuel for power" NO NO NO. This is one of the dumbest myths in the automotive world. Facts: Octane is a measure of how a fuel resists igniting under temperature and pressure. High compression engines need high octane to prevent premature detonation before the spark. But a high octane fuel can have LESS energy density. Saying "fast cars need high octane" is a holdover from marketing campaigns in the 50s when octane ratings became a thing and companies wanted to sell more high octane fuel. This is like saying race cars need to mount bigger brakes to make a car go faster. The brakes don't have anything to do with the car going faster. It just happens that when a car goes really fast, it will then also need big brakes. Just like a high compression engine will need high octane fuel. But the fuel is to resist detonation. The high compression is what makes the power.

  12. RODRIGO FILHO

    RODRIGO FILHO

    10 päivää sitten

    Yes the 80s... Best time for racing, no bullshit, just insane power and aero.

  13. Chuckie

    Chuckie

    11 päivää sitten

    Crazy thing is a few old engineers have said if you took these engines and ran them with a modern ecu and mapping they’d make over 2,000 HP easy.

  14. ferrarikingdom

    ferrarikingdom

    12 päivää sitten

    It was never used as rocket fuel and never even used in jets it was used in some German ww2 fighters though

  15. Hector

    Hector

    12 päivää sitten

    Title should be..... When f1 cars used to be f1 cars 🏎

  16. Aaron's Random Life

    Aaron's Random Life

    12 päivää sitten

    Toluene is NOT jet fuel. Nor is it really or has it really ever been used as an additive in jet fuel. Jet fuel is mostly naturally refined hydrocarbons, very similar to diesel fuel or kerosene. Nice try with the clickbait title and dramatic avoidance of saying what the fuel they used actually was.

  17. Santiago Arbelaez

    Santiago Arbelaez

    13 päivää sitten

    Imagine being a f1 driver and your boss tells you how much was spend on fuel so you feel pressured to make the race worth the money 😂

  18. philip wakeham

    philip wakeham

    13 päivää sitten

    Toluene is also the fuel in TNT (tri nitrate toluene)

  19. Lunar Graphix

    Lunar Graphix

    14 päivää sitten

    banned f1 technology combined make a 1 car...

  20. Smokey Yunick

    Smokey Yunick

    14 päivää sitten

    Took rocket fuel and diesel to get 120 octane, we used to buy 120 octane race gas at the drag strip back in the 80’s for our NoS cars

  21. Thrust vectoring

    Thrust vectoring

    14 päivää sitten

    Toluene is primarily a paint thinner, then a drug that most homeless people use and then a rocket fuel. It is not really that common in rocket fuel industry, as it is common amongst painters and drug users...

  22. Sutapa Samanta

    Sutapa Samanta

    15 päivää sitten

    Learn something new everyday

  23. Rusty Shackleford

    Rusty Shackleford

    17 päivää sitten

    Automobile racing in the 80s was the best. F1 and Group B rally.

  24. Kelly Oubre Jr.

    Kelly Oubre Jr.

    17 päivää sitten

    This might sound daft but I think current f1 should have 1300 hp and weight 500kg with current downforce levels to bring back the sound and liveliness of the alonso days

  25. Kelly Oubre Jr.

    Kelly Oubre Jr.

    17 päivää sitten

    They should bring it back 🗣

  26. Kiyoone

    Kiyoone

    18 päivää sitten

    This was the golden era... legends driving. Nowadays is meh

  27. Rebecca Kenworthy

    Rebecca Kenworthy

    19 päivää sitten

    I'm 2:51 into the vid, the fuel consumption has been mentioned many times at this point - but why not explain to the viewers WHY they were running such a rich mixture? I'm sure you know, a fat mixture is a safe tune, as leaner mixtures burn much hotter. Additionally, the overly rich mixture can act like water injection, further cooling the combustion temps (but potentially washing the oil out of the cross- hatching on the cylinder walls, causing excessive piston, ring and cylinder wall wear). Generally the higher the combustion pressure, the higher the combustion temps... Hence the excess fuel was used to cool the combustion temps... Elementary my dear Whatson

  28. Todd

    Todd

    20 päivää sitten

    normies: "ah the turbos weren't that big, plus they had twin turbos so less lag" turbos: *pump 5 bar of boost into 1.5 liter V6*

  29. Make Asylums Great Again • 10 years ago

    Make Asylums Great Again • 10 years ago

    22 päivää sitten

    100% NOT ROCKET FUEL

  30. Niko942

    Niko942

    22 päivää sitten

    In a free society, drivers would be allowed to choose how much danger they want to be exposed to.

  31. GregzVR

    GregzVR

    22 päivää sitten

    F1 used the 'jungle juice' toxic concoctions, up until 1992, when 'pump fuel' was mandated. Ferrari(Agip) and McLaren Honda(Shell) had toxic fuels for their qualifying engines, right up until 1991. From then, the ingredients in the pump fuels were the same as road car fuel, but I guess they played around with the percentages of the ingredients, F1 being F1.

  32. BoostHit

    BoostHit

    23 päivää sitten

    It was roughly 90% toluene. High energy density and the main point it was extremely knock resistant allowed crazy boost levels. Can be added to pump gas up 2 about 20% to increase knock resistance. Ha

  33. -EGThorn13- SilverTrophy

    -EGThorn13- SilverTrophy

    24 päivää sitten

    For People wondering 5.5Bar of pressure is almost 80PSi

  34. ##### Smith

    ##### Smith

    25 päivää sitten

    They badged this engine as Megatron. Rumour has it the engine blocks were left in the smoking section of the BMW factory for workers to urinate on. What difference that would make is anyone's guess.

  35. ##### Smith

    ##### Smith

    25 päivää sitten

    Senator ran out of fuel first. Always the master.

  36. Pedro_

    Pedro_

    26 päivää sitten

    You keep saying toluLene.

  37. sam walbank

    sam walbank

    26 päivää sitten

    Interesting they ran on rocket fuel in 80’s I remember early 90’s silverstone and the special cocktails.. defo had a distinct smell... but remember stories of empty barrels been peed in so others teams couldn’t swab samples of the fuel ....

  38. Tyrox 222

    Tyrox 222

    27 päivää sitten

    The coolest decades in motorsports where the 60s, 70s and 80s

  39. Alain Belanger

    Alain Belanger

    28 päivää sitten

    BMW Use V2 first intercontinental missile

  40. Antonio63 GGG

    Antonio63 GGG

    28 päivää sitten

    Toluene- true, it was a major constituent. Dense, that means high energy per unit volume; a major constituent of unleaded petrols in Europe, too, as it is cheap and high- octane... Now, the high prices of F1 turbo fuels came not from that (or the diesel, added also to bring down the octane rating that was regulated) but from special high-energy additives that got a few % out of combustion. One I was hearing of at the time was cubane, a strained hydrocarbon, extremely energetic and dense (1.29 g/cm3) and also high-octane because of its kinetic stability. It is made by a difficult and expensive synthetic route; today you can buy it or some derivatives for lab use at tens of euros per gram. Big oil sponsors would set up production labs, saving on the scale, but still that few % that they added would drive the price up to 100s of euro per kg (I use euro instead of currencies of the time for laziness).

  41. Z T

    Z T

    29 päivää sitten

    And you ask me wy i find todays racing boring 1930s to 1990s was the peak of motorsport sound feel and real racing and so much more sadly i only could encounter 1% by my own as i was born way to late (1995) i literaly feel myself in the wrong generation.

  42. Shaua Shah

    Shaua Shah

    Uukausi sitten

    Luftwaffe beschde

  43. ggibby0

    ggibby0

    Uukausi sitten

    This really puts the "Gas" into "Gas Gas Gas".

  44. Crepitus

    Crepitus

    Uukausi sitten

    Cool video, I was in a bad mood and this helped distract me. Thank you

  45. Andrew W.C.

    Andrew W.C.

    Uukausi sitten

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but fuel freezing was essentially the equivalent of adding a big shot of nitrous onto the engine.

  46. Andrew W.C.

    Andrew W.C.

    Uukausi sitten

    I’m not sure about F1, I’m sure it was much the same, but I remember reading that the team bosses for the ELF motorcycle GP team had a special clause in their contracts that said they would never have to handle or even come in close proximity to the fuel.

  47. Ivaylo Tashev

    Ivaylo Tashev

    Uukausi sitten

    300l/race...? Once I managed to burn 42l/200km with my Honda (d16z6).. the last 40 minutes - not dropping under 5500 & topping at 7000 rpm on 4th & 5th (highway) - ended up with 2.5l of coolant missing & spun rod bearing... :D

  48. DivideBy Zero

    DivideBy Zero

    Uukausi sitten

    Well, I'm sold! Off to the hardware store to buy a gallon of paint thinner to top off the tank on my M3...

  49. Hotas F-16

    Hotas F-16

    Uukausi sitten

    sooo who will be using quiktrip fuel?

  50. Tomasz Kusmierz

    Tomasz Kusmierz

    Uukausi sitten

    There was also a nice caveat in FIA rules, which did not state that you had to run on same engine in qualifying round as in main race - HENCE, teams would run far higher boost during qualifying laps and destroy the engine -> quickly replace the engine for main race and run with lower boost (and different map as well to stop engine from melting)

  51. Bob Thompson

    Bob Thompson

    Uukausi sitten

    On the fuel being a second a lap different well that's A TON when your a second ahead of second place when the white flag comes out

  52. Bob Thompson

    Bob Thompson

    Uukausi sitten

    I think 70s-80s f1 cars looked cooler

  53. Bob Thompson

    Bob Thompson

    Uukausi sitten

    Diesel will also lubricate the cylinder

  54. Bob Thompson

    Bob Thompson

    Uukausi sitten

    1 hp per CC. WOW and the gauge that said 4 bar is 58 psi of boost. 5.5 bar is 79.77 psi

  55. Bob Thompson

    Bob Thompson

    Uukausi sitten

    It's all because of octane!!!!

  56. Mark

    Mark

    Uukausi sitten

    Such a great channel... So interesting! I was never into F1 but your vids show us just how ingenious the sport is. Wow... just wow!

  57. Dave Mac

    Dave Mac

    Uukausi sitten

    Great vids fella, however do you really think fuel burning hurts the “plannet”? Come on, and if it did do you really think thats the end goal with these restrictions? Look at dpf and tell me thats not double the pollution than a regular diesel engine then extrapolate it out and it becomes very clear

  58. Peter Clout

    Peter Clout

    Uukausi sitten

    Rocket fuel is a two part mix of peroxide and oxygen. Hardly suitable for car. The other rocket fuel is a solid. What is likely is old style petrol of 110+ron with methanol.

  59. Don Raptor

    Don Raptor

    Uukausi sitten

    Rockets run on Kerosene! You are full of BS!

  60. GreenHeat

    GreenHeat

    Uukausi sitten

    6:54 Indeed 1.5 is less than 6.4

  61. denvera1g1

    denvera1g1

    Uukausi sitten

    What about direct injection liquid hydrogen? get a small boost from the hydrogen expansion, but massive energy density(3x as energy dense as gasoline), and as long as there isnt an explosive decompression, would be in theory safer than gasoline, as if there is a leak, it vents into the atmosphere and quickly rises away instead of the vapors flowing around on the ground.

  62. Nick Cosentino

    Nick Cosentino

    Uukausi sitten

    Thanks for taking me back.

  63. Peter Oxley

    Peter Oxley

    Uukausi sitten

    When MEN were MEN, not kneeling in surrender on the grid...I miss those days so bad.

    • calska140

      calska140

      Uukausi sitten

      They'll come back. This is too extreme. There will be a backlash. I will kneel for people I respect (more than basic common courtesy respect of course,) . As things appear I'll be long dead before people worth respecting appear again. Alot of people crying about fictional hardships they created to excuse their ignominious failures. Can't even look at themselves as a possible contributor to any of their problems. Weak.

  64. Kitchen Jail

    Kitchen Jail

    Uukausi sitten

    It costs 400.000 dollars to drive the BMW rocket F1... for 12 seconds. - bmw rocket fuel supplier propably

  65. repentnow

    repentnow

    Uukausi sitten

    Stopping F1 will really help global warming instead of us average people turning off the two light bulbs in our tiny houses

  66. zeus lim

    zeus lim

    Uukausi sitten

    I didn't know they used toluene in rockets. It's so carcinogenic that we leave the bottle in the fume hood. I thought they were sticking hydrazine in lol.

  67. Brice Fleckenstein

    Brice Fleckenstein

    Uukausi sitten

    Wrong from the start. There is no such thing as "rocket fuel", rockets have used a wide range of different fuels in different rocket engines - and toulene was NOT one of them except perhaps in EXPERIMENTS.

  68. Danny Danny

    Danny Danny

    Uukausi sitten

    Big correction, the type of fuel you use doesn't change the amount of power you make, the only reason you would need higher octane fuel is because you make more power.

  69. DARRENTINOnz

    DARRENTINOnz

    Uukausi sitten

    Love your videos man but pls get a haircut

  70. RC3

    RC3

    Uukausi sitten

    to be honest i don't think f1 is a "race" anymore. as a racer you just want to push as fast as you can whatever it takes, nowadays it's a marathon and no racing action what so ever. with tech we have now there should be a safe way to bring back a racer being a racer, instead of a paddock wall engineer working 50 laps or so on strats while driving a car, if a racer wanted to worry about strats i think he'd become a paddock wall race engineer instead of a racer. i once opened my mouth in 2019 that they didn't push the car to qualifying times during a race, the next upcomin race i saw a response, way more stops for tires like 3 to 4 and the race was much more enjoyable to watch, more back end teams were in a challenging position for points. so yeah they need to give racers the focus on being a racer back. change my mind.

  71. DeepFriedSalt

    DeepFriedSalt

    Uukausi sitten

    I was expecting something more exotic than toluene, but then again, I only really thought of toluene as a precursor to TNT, rather than a dangerous chemical in its own right.

  72. 19822andy

    19822andy

    Uukausi sitten

    To be fair a second a lap in F1 time is humongous.

  73. the dude

    the dude

    Uukausi sitten

    me hearing a faint ill never die: turns up sound me when i find out it accutaly is the song: breakdown breakdown

  74. mcgeufer

    mcgeufer

    Uukausi sitten

    Toluene was used as rocket fuel? I just know that stuff as paint thinner... And I really struggle to believe that is was the common rocket fuel in the 80is.

  75. Rich Hopkins

    Rich Hopkins

    Uukausi sitten

    Why would they do that? Rocket fuel is less efficient and wouldn't make the car go any faster

  76. Shaun Clancy

    Shaun Clancy

    Uukausi sitten

    Nitromethane, or top fuel, as used in top fuel dragsters, is not rocket fuel. The Saturn V rocket's first stage carries 203,400 gallons (770,000 liters) of kerosene fuel and 318,000 gallons (1.2 million liters) of liquid oxygen needed for combustion. Liquid oxygen (LOX) and highly refined kerosene (RP-1). Used for the first stages of the Atlas V, Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Soyuz, Zenit, and developmental rockets like Angara and Long March 6. This combination is widely regarded as the most practical for boosters that lift off at ground level and therefore must operate at full atmospheric pressure. LOX and liquid hydrogen. Used on the Centaur upper stage, the Delta IV rocket, the H-IIA rocket, most stages of the European Ariane 5, and the Space Launch System core and upper stages. LOX and liquid methane (from Liquefied natural gas) are planned for use on several rockets in development, including Vulcan, New Glenn, and SpaceX Starship. Those are examples of actual rocket fuel, not the stuff they put into top fuel dragsters or put into an F1 car. Nitromethane and liquid methane are not the same thing, nitro is made by combining propane and nitric acid. It's main advantage is it contains more oxygen than other fuels, allowing it to burn with less atmospheric oxygen, rockets have LOX so this is irrelevant and you ideally want fuels without oxygen in them.

  77. Mein Warcraft Tagebuch

    Mein Warcraft Tagebuch

    Uukausi sitten

    The BMW engine did not break the dyno it went beyond the scale - at the time they had a dyno that could display 1000 or 1100 hp (not exactly sure) and when they tested the engine it went beyond that, that's when the rumors of 1400hp started.

  78. Bruce Dressel

    Bruce Dressel

    Uukausi sitten

    We don't live on a planet little feller more like a plane.

  79. Pat Riley

    Pat Riley

    Uukausi sitten

    An unpleasant effect of petrochemicals, back in the 80s before crack poisoned people, the parks were full of people sniffing rags, watching some stagger like zombies i asked what they were sniffing and one said "toil"...people will choose poison far too often.

  80. Matthew Loughlin

    Matthew Loughlin

    Uukausi sitten

    Lol back when teams would say ‘show me where I asked’ to the FIA

  81. Dodgy Dave

    Dodgy Dave

    Uukausi sitten

    When you cool something it gets smaller..... explain that to water......

  82. Scotty

    Scotty

    Uukausi sitten

    acording to what I have read about rockets, they run on kerosene !!!!!

  83. Julius Berten

    Julius Berten

    Uukausi sitten

    I was thinking of rp1 which is just pretty refined kerosine/diesel and i was like "so? Where is the problem?"

  84. 0jodele0

    0jodele0

    Uukausi sitten

    Toluene has not been used in any rocket worth mentioning. Hydrazine, on the other hand is and has been used in motorsports! Nitrous oxide has been successful used as a rocket fuel that has set world records, but it is most notably referred to as laughing gas. See history.nasa.gov/conghand/propelnt.htm why toluene has NOT been used as "rocket fuel"!

  85. antryo YT

    antryo YT

    Uukausi sitten

    Just a note but elio had already won a race Austria 1982 so elio 2nd win was san Marino 1985.

  86. beeble2003

    beeble2003

    Uukausi sitten

    Aside from a couple of experiments, toluene has never been used as a rocket fuel: it's too heavy and the performance increase over kerosene isn't enough to compensate for that. It worked in F1 because their primary concern was volume and because the weight penalty wasn't too bad in an application where the vehicle didn't have to lift its own fuel into the sky. In fact, it may even have been an advantage, given how much effort F1 cars go to to generate more "weight" through downforce. Toluene has also never seen significant use as a jet fuel where, again, weight is the ruling factor. So, interesting video, but based on a number of major misconceptions.

  87. William Chamberlain

    William Chamberlain

    Uukausi sitten

    Toluene is methylbenzene - benzene (very toxic) with a methyl CH3 group stuck on one side of the ring. I'll have to look in Ignition (John D Clark, 1972) again, but I'm not seeing much use of toluene as rocket fuel. Maybe as part of a mix to get higher combustion rates than RP-1, but as it carries a lot of carbon for the number of hydrogens I'd guess that the exhaust velocity would be lower and so would specific impulse.

  88. William Chamberlain

    William Chamberlain

    Uukausi sitten

    The raptor engine (4:57) runs on methane and liquid oxygen.

  89. Fenixz Filip

    Fenixz Filip

    Uukausi sitten

    That being said, F1 today is but a sad shadow of it's former self.

  90. En Usko

    En Usko

    Uukausi sitten

    1400bhp from a 1.6l WTF.

  91. EliteDavid Horne

    EliteDavid Horne

    Uukausi sitten

    250 litres of fuel in a 220 litre tank is clever.

  92. Hifty Long head

    Hifty Long head

    Uukausi sitten

    So much is scientifically wrongly said in this video

  93. megapet777

    megapet777

    Uukausi sitten

    Damn the 80's were crazy xD

  94. matthew spence

    matthew spence

    Uukausi sitten

    they should start using acetylene instead of gasoline

  95. Superbogan

    Superbogan

    Uukausi sitten

    "Its probably smaller than whats in your car" Laughs in unreliable 1.4 twin charged golf

  96. Robbie Steel

    Robbie Steel

    Uukausi sitten

    My sister's car is a Volkswagen Polo with a 1.4L engine. so it's definitely more powerful than hers but, not mine, dad's nor mum's car!

  97. droidtigger

    droidtigger

    Uukausi sitten

    "tolulene"

  98. The j.

    The j.

    Uukausi sitten

    All of the roblox jailbreak players, pls stfu

  99. kain hall

    kain hall

    Uukausi sitten

    4:10 thats not a fuel sample..... thats a pee sample!!!! . either they are playing a joke on the F1 rules team..... OR THEY ARE RUNNING CARS ON WEE!!!! . F1 has saved our energy crisis....... just run our cars on our own piss!!!! . i bet if you are drinking beer..... the pee fuel would have some ethanol in it.... so if ya drive a turbo / high compression car..... drink some beer before ya fuel it up ;)

  100. Renno Marco

    Renno Marco

    Uukausi sitten

    Great video, thanks. I would argue that the moment you start adding fuel and tyre restrictions to racing, it becomes an “economy challenge” and no longer racing. At the moment F1 is the most expensive absurd rule filled economy challenge on earth. Pity that...it used to be spectacular.

Seuraava